Haymarket Cuts Costs With Suggestion Box.
Press Gazette is reporting an internal email sent by Lord Heseltine to his UK staff asking for cost saving suggestions. There is a reward pot of £10,000 (don't overdo it Michael!) to be shared amongst the best ideas. Mmm. I am not normally one to offer free consultancy but I will offer a couple of health warnings.
1) How will you discriminate between ideas that drop out of ones own job and those that are truly innovative?
2) What will you do if ten people have the same idea?
3) If lots of people send in ideas, but only a few of them get a money reward, will you not take up the other ideas? Or will you pursue all the cost saving ideas and only reward some of the people? Or pursue all the ideas and reward everyone with a very small sum? Any which way isn't there a risk of demotivating more people than you please?
4) The best cost saving initiatives involve all the staff all the time not a few people for a moment. Might not a better scheme be, to declare your cost budget and pay out to all staff, equally a percentage of the savings made in a co-ordinated margin improvement programme. That way you will be surprised at the peer pressure not to waste anything from stationary to travel, to paper, to pointless devlopment projects.
A 1% improvement in costs increases Haymarkets profits by 7% or more than £2m in a full year. Paying out 1/2% of the saving at best looks less than generous.
In short, the kind of scheme proposed is normally treated with cynicism by staff and at the end proves to be divisive and morale sapping and not very effective at cutting costs. That someone sent the internal note to PG suggests to me that Haymarket staff might already have worked that out.
1) How will you discriminate between ideas that drop out of ones own job and those that are truly innovative?
2) What will you do if ten people have the same idea?
3) If lots of people send in ideas, but only a few of them get a money reward, will you not take up the other ideas? Or will you pursue all the cost saving ideas and only reward some of the people? Or pursue all the ideas and reward everyone with a very small sum? Any which way isn't there a risk of demotivating more people than you please?
4) The best cost saving initiatives involve all the staff all the time not a few people for a moment. Might not a better scheme be, to declare your cost budget and pay out to all staff, equally a percentage of the savings made in a co-ordinated margin improvement programme. That way you will be surprised at the peer pressure not to waste anything from stationary to travel, to paper, to pointless devlopment projects.
A 1% improvement in costs increases Haymarkets profits by 7% or more than £2m in a full year. Paying out 1/2% of the saving at best looks less than generous.
In short, the kind of scheme proposed is normally treated with cynicism by staff and at the end proves to be divisive and morale sapping and not very effective at cutting costs. That someone sent the internal note to PG suggests to me that Haymarket staff might already have worked that out.
Labels: cost savings., haymarket, heseltine
posted by Businessmediablogger @ 3:44 pm
1 Comments:
SAVING PAPER?CUTTING COSTS
It is one thing mailing out millions of pieces of direct mail, (one of customers was putting out 140 million), but if you do not want to waste money, damage your reputation by delivering to the wrong address/recipient and them hacking off, you need to handle the returns.
RETURNED & GONE AWAY MAIL
Specialists in returned & gone away mail data capture services to organizations that mail directly to their customers
10% of all direct mail fails to reach its target
13% of the population move very year
We provide our service to major banks/credit card companies
Regularly & rigorously vetted for quality & security.
We open returned mail
Extract the contents
Scan relevant address, bar code or unique ref. number
Verify and collate the data
Return information to you in an agreed format, to suit your systems
Provide information on CD/DVD or via a VPN
Sending mail to the wrong address/occupier
Damages your brand
Wastes resources damages the environment
Angers people
Keep your mailing lists clean maximises effectiveness
Improves accuracy of direct marketing campaigns
Proven to reduce volume of returned & undelivered mail
Generates significant savings to overall direct mail spend
We also reduce your carbon footprint
All waste paper confidentially destroyed, pulped and recycled
Yours
tim.craig@veri-data.co.uk
Post a Comment
<< Home